
Abstract
This paper outlines the progress that has been
made in a study on human body dynamics during vibration
therapy. At the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, vibration
therapy has been applied to spinal cord injured (SCI) patients
in an effort to maintain the patients' bone density. Some
clinical trials have not been successful, and thus a better
understanding of human responses to vibration therapy is
required to ascertain if and how it can be applied to maintain
bone density in SCI subjects. Experiments with SCI and
healthy subjects were conducted to determine the accelerations
present in the lower extremities during vibration therapy. The
results showed negligible differences between the responses of
SCI and healthy subjects, but considerable differences between
the responses of subjects with different body types. A
mathematical model of a standing subject was also developed,
and theoretical predictions using the model were found to
match experimental data reasonably.
Introduction
Doctors and rehabilitation therapists at the Lyndhurst
Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (TRI) have
conducted several clinical trials investigating the feasibility
of using vibration therapy to regulate bone density in the
lower extremities of spinal cord injured patients who have
little or no motor control below the waist. TRI has an
apparatus that secures the subject in a standing position with
the feet bearing most of the subject's weight. Vibrations are
then applied to the subject via the platform that they are
standing on. The TRI apparatus vibrates the subject in a
horizontal direction, unlike previous studies of this kind that
applied vertical vibrations [1]. Because the apparatus
vibrates the subject horizontally and constrains the body at
certain points, the propagation of vibrations through the
body may differ significantly from situations where the
induced vibrations are vertical. The purpose of this study is
to ascertain the degree to which differences in the type of
therapy applied to a patient affect the parameters that are
important in stimulating increases in bone density through
vibration therapy, and to determine how different subjects
will respond to vibration therapy.
A number of studies have been done to identify the most
important parameters in bone remodeling through
mechanical stimulation. Several studies conducted with
animal subjects in the 1980's demonstrated that the strain
magnitudes [2], strain rates [3], and strain distributions [4]
present in bones have large effects on bone density. These
parameters are functions of the forces present in the lower
extremities.
To examine the forces in the legs during different types
of vibration therapy, a lumped mass model has been
developed using physiological data from literature. In the
past, linear lumped mass models have been used to predict
human responses to both uni-directional vertical vibrations
[5] and multi-directional vibrations [6]. Experiments were
also conducted with healthy and spinal cord injured subjects
to determine the accelerations present in the lower
extremities during different types of vibration therapy. The
experimental results were analyzed to provide a better
understanding of the mechanical properties of the human
body during vibration therapy. These results were also used
to calibrate the model in order to produce more accurate
theoretical predictions.
Results
The experimental results showed behavior that was
generally as expected. The magnitude of the RMS
acceleration was typically shown to decrease from segment
to segment moving from the foot to the upper body, and the
high frequency content of the acceleration signals was
strongly attenuated by successive body segments in all of
the subjects.
When SCI and healthy subject data were compared, the
results generally showed negligible differences in the
mechanical properties of these two subject groups. RMS
acceleration ratios varied much more between subjects with
different body types than between healthy and SCI subjects.
All of the subjects displayed similar frequency responses,
regardless of body type or health status.
Almost completely uniformly, the data showed an
increase in the foot to tibia and foot to femur acceleration
ratio values when the subject was constrained, for both
healthy subjects and for SCI subject No. 2. The most
notable exceptions to this trend were the measured hip
accelerations. These accelerations were shown to decrease
when the constraining device was applied in most cases. In
contrast to the healthy subjects and SCI subject No. 2, SCI
subject No. 1 showed uniform decreases in acceleration ratio
values during constrained therapy.
Testimonials


















